Repetitive work eats the week
The team retypes data, sorts documents, compares emails and checks statuses. Everyone knows it wastes time, but nobody has space to fix it.
Process consulting + AI
We help 50-500 person companies reclaim time in operations: map bottlenecks, calculate process cost and launch a POC that works inside existing systems.
30 minutes. No commitment. You leave with a visual map of the problem and solution direction.
Diagnosis
It is rarely a single-tool problem. It is usually a process that grew with the company and stopped fitting inside people's heads.
The team retypes data, sorts documents, compares emails and checks statuses. Everyone knows it wastes time, but nobody has space to fix it.
Every new client means another person in operations. The company sells more, but it gets harder to see where the real cost is created.
One vacation or resignation can stop part of the process. Onboarding takes weeks because there is no map of the work or decision rules.
If even one point feels familiar, start with a short diagnosis: where time disappears, what it costs and whether technology makes sense here at all.
Outcome
We do not sell an AI model or a platform. We deliver an organized process, a working solution and numbers that show whether the investment makes sense.
We document workflow, exceptions and decisions. Handover becomes smooth instead of relying on memory.
Technology takes repetitive steps while people focus on exceptions, client relationships and decisions that need context.
Before implementation we agree the metric: time, document volume, errors, handling cost or team throughput.
The solution lives in your systems. You get documentation, training and a clear maintenance or handover plan.
Plain language
Sometimes, but we do not start with a model. First we check whether the problem comes from process, data, responsibility or only then from missing technology.
CEOs, COOs and managers in 50-500 person companies with lots of documents, orders, emails and manual decisions in the back office.
A process map, risk list, recommendations and a decision: what to automate, what to leave alone and how to measure pilot ROI.
Because the biggest risk is not technical. First you need to confirm adoption, data quality and real impact on one process.
Who it is for
We usually work with business decision-makers who feel margin and scale pressure, but do not want to buy another conference slogan.
Document verification, application completeness, risk classification, credit decisions and partner communication, with tax, audit and sector constraints in mind.
Orders from many sources, client formats, marketplaces, translations, validation and handoff to fulfilment.
Repeatable document processes, request flows, case statuses and reporting without manual data assembly.
Ticket classification, context completion, exception queues and fewer cases bouncing between departments.
How we work
Each stage has a concrete outcome. If we do not see business sense along the way, we say it directly.
30 minutes
1-2 weeks
2-4 weeks
after the pilot
Examples
These scenarios show the type of problems we solve. The goal is always the same: less manual work, more control and decisions based on numbers.
Orders arrived in different formats and languages. Staff retyped data into the internal system, and every sales increase required more operational headcount.
We connected document recognition, validation rules and an API integration. Orders enter the system standardized, translated and ready for exception handling.
Manual retyping disappears from daily work. The team stops copying data, focuses on exceptions and can handle higher volume without proportional hiring.
Partner documents arrived by email, often incomplete or in different versions. Analysts lost time on collection, naming and checking basic requirements.
We designed a document queue, completeness rules and an AI layer for classification and data extraction. People decide where context is needed.
The process becomes measurable: you know how many cases are waiting, what is missing and which ones require an analyst.
Cases bounced between inboxes. Each department added its own information, but nobody saw the full status or owner of the next step.
We organized statuses, ownership and input data. The system classifies the case, adds context and routes it to the right queue.
Less manual searching, fewer handoffs between departments and a clear view of where the process actually stops.
Why us
The biggest AI risk is rarely the model. It is whether someone understands the process, numbers, people and system constraints before implementation starts.
A conversation about margin, risk and team work goes directly to the people designing the technical solution. The business intent does not get lost between departments.
We combine experience in scale, architecture and compliance with startup-style iteration. For the last 3 years, we have focused on AI and process automation.
We use components we know from practice: OCR, document agents, API integrations and LLM management. That means we do not rebuild from scratch what can be validated faster.
During the project you see statuses, decisions, blockers and next steps. We work close to the team, with a dedicated Slack/Teams channel and same-business-day replies.

About us
optimAI is a two-person company founded by software architects and AI experts. We connect business conversation with technical decisions, so there is no broken telephone between strategy and implementation.
We have over 10 years of experience in corporate and startup projects: from scale, architecture and compliance to fast iteration. For the last 3 years, we have focused on AI and process automation.
We also automate our own work: research, prospecting, content and delivery. We sell the operating model we use every day.
Q&A
No. Often the missing process description is the main problem. At the start it is enough to point to the area that consumes time or blocks growth.
Yes, when needed, but business communication goes to the CEO, COO or process owner. IT should not be the only translator of the problem.
Usually 2-4 weeks from diagnosis to measurable impact on one process. Timing depends on access to data, systems and decision-makers.
After diagnosis, we break the scope into stages, cost and a success metric. We usually suggest a PLN 3000 pilot implementation first if the problem can be validated without a large rollout. If we do not see potential, we say it directly.
We choose tools for the process. Sometimes it is AI, sometimes an API integration, and sometimes a simpler form plus ownership rules.
We say so directly. We prefer ending with an honest recommendation over implementing something that will not improve the result.
Contact
On the first call we do not sell an implementation. We check whether the problem makes business sense, how to measure it and where to start without large risk.